Skip to main content
← Blog·8 min read·September 21, 2026

Is CompTIA Security+ worth it in 2026?

Is Security+ worth it? The answer depends on your starting point and goal. CompTIA Security+ (exam SY0-701) is a security certification. This guide walks through who it is for, who should wait, BLS occupation data, and the current DoD 8140 qualification model. If you are still deciding your starting point, our guide on which CompTIA cert to take first pairs well with this one.

N
IT Service Center Manager, former IT teacher, founder of Revtek

Who is Security+ actually for?

Security+ is for people who already have some IT footing and want to move into security, compliance, or a role that names it as a requirement.

It is vendor neutral, so it is not tied to one product or platform. The people who get the most out of it fit a recognizable profile.

If you already hold or are studying CompTIA A+, Security+ is a natural next step once you are comfortable with how devices, operating systems, and networks fit together. It builds on that foundation rather than replacing it.

  • Help desk technicians and junior sysadmins who want their next role to involve security work.
  • Network technicians who already understand how traffic moves and now want to protect it.
  • Career changers who built a foundation with an entry cert and are ready for the security layer.
  • Anyone targeting a job or federal contract that lists Security+ by name.

Who should wait before taking Security+?

If you are brand new to IT with no hands-on experience, wait. Security+ assumes you already understand networking, operating systems, and basic troubleshooting. Skipping the fundamentals makes the exam harder and the knowledge shallower.

CompTIA suggests candidates have a couple of years of IT experience with a security focus, or an equivalent foundation, before sitting for Security+. You can pass without it, but you will spend a lot of energy memorizing terms that would make plain sense if you understood the systems underneath them. That is the difference between someone who can recognize a concept on a test and someone who can use it on the job.

Many people are better served building a foundation first with an entry cert, then layering Security+ on top. That order is not a hard rule, but it builds on itself, which helps you actually do the work, not just repeat the vocabulary.

So what does building that foundation look like in practice? For a lot of people starting cold, the cleanest route is three steps. Begin with CompTIA A+ to get comfortable with hardware, operating systems, and everyday troubleshooting. Add Network+ so that subnets, routing, and how traffic actually moves become second nature. Then take Security+ once those layers are solid. By the time you reach the security material, most of the vocabulary already has a picture attached to it, and you are learning how to defend systems you genuinely understand rather than memorizing acronyms in a vacuum.

You do not have to climb all three rungs, though. If you already work in IT and have spent real time around networks and endpoints, going straight to Security+ is reasonable, and it can be the right call when a job posting or a federal contract names the cert specifically. Prior experience can stand in for the earlier certifications. The exact ladder matters less than the honest question underneath it: do you already have a working mental model of the systems Security+ is trying to protect?

Be honest about which group you are in. If you are not sure where you land, a short readiness quiz or an afternoon reviewing networking basics will tell you more than another day of second-guessing. Pick your starting cert from what you find, not from the job title you eventually want.

What do the salary and job numbers really say?

The demand is real, and it is documented. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a median annual wage of $124,910 for information security analysts as of May 2024, with employment for the role projected to grow much faster than the average job.

That growth figure is 29 percent from 2024 to 2034, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Outlook Handbook, which also projects about 16,000 openings each year on average over the decade. Numbers like that are why cybersecurity keeps landing on best-career lists.

Here is the part those headlines skip. That $124,910 figure is the median for experienced information security analysts, not a day-one salary. Information security analyst is a job title, not a certification, and a person earning anywhere near that median can have years of hands-on security work behind them. A person who just passed Security+ is competing for something earlier in the arc: help desk, junior security analyst, or a tier-one seat in a security operations center.

The analyst median is occupation data, not a salary attached to Security+. Pay varies by region, employer, industry, experience, and clearance requirements. Use local postings and BLS area data instead of treating the national median as an entry-level forecast.

Security+ records performance on its exam. It does not create an employment outcome or substitute for experience.

One more honest caveat keeps this grounded. A strong outlook for the whole field does not guarantee any one person a job. Those openings are spread across the entire country and the entire decade, and they are not evenly distributed by city or by specialty. Where you live, when you apply, and the specific roles you target shape your odds far more than the headline growth rate does.

How does Security+ fit the DoD 8140 model?

DoD Manual 8140.03 replaced 8570.01-M. Under 8140, a position is coded to a DCWF work role and proficiency level. Certification is one of three ways to meet the foundational qualification, alongside education and training. Security+ appears in the qualification matrix for multiple work roles; check the current matrix for the role code in the posting.

What does Security+ measure, and what does it not?

Security+ measures performance against its published exam scope. It is not a job guarantee or proof of workplace performance.

Security+ SY0-701 runs up to 90 questions in 90 minutes, mixes multiple choice with performance-based questions, and has five domains: General Security Concepts (12 percent), Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations (22 percent), Security Architecture (18 percent), Security Operations (28 percent), and Security Program Management and Oversight (20 percent).

Use the objectives to organize study, then add project evidence and practice explaining your decisions. Our Security+ cost breakdown can help with exam-fee and study-budget planning.

  • Hands-on practice in a personal lab or an authored scenario.
  • Timed practice exams for pacing practice.
  • Explaining your reasoning in plain language.

So, is Security+ worth it?

For someone studying security, defense, or compliance topics, Security+ may fit, with two conditions. Build your foundation first so the material makes sense, and treat the exam as a starting point. Compare it against the Security+ certification path, then check the current qualification matrix if a DoD role is your goal.

Sources

  1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Information Security Analysts, Occupational Outlook Handbook. Median annual wage of $124,910 as of May 2024, employment projected to grow 29 percent from 2024 to 2034, and about 16,000 openings per year on average over the decade.
  2. CompTIA. CompTIA Security+ certification (SY0-701). Confirms the current exam version is SY0-701 and lists the five exam domains and their weightings, with Security Operations the heaviest at 28 percent.
  3. DoD Cyber Exchange. DoD 8570 to 8140 transition. Documents the transition from the older 8570 directive to DoD 8140. Use the current qualification matrix for a specific work role.

Who writes this, and who checks it

Nicholas Miller
IT Service Center Manager · former IT teacher · founder of Revtek IT Solutions

Nick directs these posts, AI helps draft them, and Nick reviews every post before it goes live. If you spot an error, tell us and we will fix it.

When a post turns out to be wrong, the fix and the date it happened go on the corrections log, in public, including the ones nobody outside noticed. We do not use confidential, recalled, or leaked exam content. The AI policy has the longer version.

LinkedIn ↗